The optimisation of Eucalyptus regeneration practices for improved survival, growth and uniformity in South African pulpwood plantations
- Authors: Hechter, Ullrich
- Date: 2024-12
- Subjects: Eucalyptus -- Regeneration -- South Africa , Forests and forestry -- Economic aspects , Forests and forestry
- Language: English
- Type: Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/68862 , vital:77135
- Description: Commercial forestry plantations in South Africa play an important role in the economy of the country, contributing 1.2% towards the gross domestic product. Currently plantation forests occupy 1.1% (1.2 million hectares) of the South African land surface, of which 75 000 hectares are re-established each year. Eucalypts constitute 43% of planted area, of which 88% is grown for pulpwood. Achieving high tree survival (>90%) is important in terms of optimising rotation-end yield. The industry origin of a 90% survival benchmark is unclear, although company procedures incorporate this as the minimum threshold in terms of re-establishment success. Past research indicates that most mortality occurs within a narrow period post-establishment and is often associated with substandard re-establishment practices and/or a stressed micro-environment. An improved understanding is needed about the various mitigation measures needed to minimize mortality during eucalypt re-establishment. Before making decisions related to mortality mitigation measures, comprehensive data are required as to their commercial applicability as well as outcomes from multiple trials that accurately quantify any impacts on tree survival and financial return. The overall purpose of this dissertation was the optimisation of Eucalyptus re-establishment practices for improved survival, growth and uniformity in South African pulpwood plantations. To achieve this, five inter-linked objectives were determined. The first objective was to highlight the most important factors contributing to increased mortality in eucalypt plantations during re-establishment. This was achieved through conducting a literature review. Citations were ranked in terms of credibility, with the importance ratings (derived from the literature sources) applied to the different factors affecting survival and growth during eucalypt re-establishment. Of the various factors impacting early eucalypt mortality, water stress and planting stock quality were considered highly important. The manner and quality of site preparation (soil and slash), planting practices (planting depth included), timing of planting (during dry, hot periods), various post-planting operations (incorrect fertiliser placement or herbicide drift) and insect pests and diseases also contribute to mortality, but to a lesser extent. These factors cannot be considered in isolation due to the complex interactions that exist between them and determining the primary causes of mortality can be elusive, especially as their impacts tend to be additive by nature. The second objective was to link survival to silvicultural treatments, site-related physiographic factors and climatic variables in South Africa. This was achieved by conducting an integrated analysis of 43 Eucalyptus trials. Of the seven re-establishment practices considered, watering, planting depth and fertiliser application were significant, with plant size, pitting method, residue management and insecticide application were not significant. However, when environmental variables were included within the analyses, there were significant site x treatment interactions for planting depth, plant size, residue management and fertiliser application. This highlights the importance of taking site related factors into consideration when interpreting the causes of mortality. The third objective was to determine the interaction between planting density and mortality on Eucalyptus growth, uniformity and financial yield at rotation end in South Africa. This was carried out to verify whether planting at different densities may be used as a preventative (before planting) mitigation measure. One trial was used to answer four keys sub-objectives: 1) The impact of three planting densities (1 102, 1 500, 1 959 SPH) with no mortality on yield at rotation-end; 2) The impact of mortality (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%) on rotation-end yield; 3) The quantification of tree performance when planting at a higher density and accepting a certain degree of mortality; and 4) The financial impact of different planting densities and mortality on rotation-end profit. Higher planting densities resulted in smaller individual trees, but with an increase in stand level performance. At rotation-end, lower mortality (0% and 10%) had significantly higher volumes ha-1 than the higher mortality (30% and 40%). Planting at higher densities (1 722 and 1 959 SPH) and accepting a certain degree of mortality resulted in non-significant differences for volume at rotation-end compared to the fully stocked 1 500 SPH treatment. A higher SPH resulted in a higher yield, but with an increase in estimated establishment/tending and harvesting costs. In contrast, an increase in mortality and/or lower SPH (in the absence of mortality) resulted in more variable stand growth, together with an increase in estimated machine harvesting productivity and reduced costs. Irrespective of SPH, the higher the mortality the greater the loss of income, with the best profit within each treatment related to full stocking (0% mortality). Within the higher panting densities, the profit gained following low mortality (10 and 20%) was similar to that of no mortality (0%), indicating that higher mortality may be tolerated when planting at higher densities, confirming the 90% survival threshold the industry aims to achieve post-establishment. The fourth objective was to determine if silviculture intervention (blanking at 1, 2 and 3 months or coppicing and interplanting at 6 months) will result in acceptable eucalypt stocking, if mortality is higher than 10% (remedial mitigation measure). Data from a re-establishment trial were analysed to determine which of the mitigation measures performed best in terms of stocking and growth. Coppicing and interplanting with larger plants was not a viable option as a mitigation measure for mortality as most of the coppice shoots have died. This may have been a result of frost. Although high re-establishment costs may be incurred, disaster clearing to waste followed by replanting is an option if mortality is unacceptably high (as opposed to leaving the stand as is). The results of this objective confirm that blanking as the current Best Operating Practice is still appropriate in South African forestry (i.e., try to have survival >90% and blank as soon as possible to retain >90% of stems). Blanked plants do contribute to volume, but for this to occur, blanking should be carried out within 4 weeks after planting to gain maximum benefit. In addition, it highlights the importance of implementing remedial mitigation measures to achieve >90% survival so as to gain maximum benefit. Using the outcomes from objectives 1-4, the fifth objective focussed on the development of a decision support system (DSS) for implementation of mitigation measures to improve survival within commercial eucalypt pulpwood plantations in South Africa. Improved survival starts with the implementation of good re-establishment practices and good quality planting stock. Mitigation measures for poor survival can be implemented either prior to re-establishment (before mortality occurs) or post re-establishment (after mortality has occurred). If poor survival still occurs after the implementation of good silviculture practices and pre-re-establishment mitigation practices (planting at higher densities), one should consider the various options available in terms of post re-establishment mitigation practices (remedial practices) such as blanking or replanting if mortality is high. Overall, the outcomes from this dissertation provide benchmark data and derived information as to the necessity for various mortality mitigation options within the commercial forestry sector in South Africa. In addition, the DSS will assist with decision making in terms of implementing the best silviculture practices and mitigation measures for improved survival during eucalypt re-establishment in South African pulpwood plantations. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Science, School of Natural Resource Science & Management, 2024
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2024-12
- Authors: Hechter, Ullrich
- Date: 2024-12
- Subjects: Eucalyptus -- Regeneration -- South Africa , Forests and forestry -- Economic aspects , Forests and forestry
- Language: English
- Type: Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/68862 , vital:77135
- Description: Commercial forestry plantations in South Africa play an important role in the economy of the country, contributing 1.2% towards the gross domestic product. Currently plantation forests occupy 1.1% (1.2 million hectares) of the South African land surface, of which 75 000 hectares are re-established each year. Eucalypts constitute 43% of planted area, of which 88% is grown for pulpwood. Achieving high tree survival (>90%) is important in terms of optimising rotation-end yield. The industry origin of a 90% survival benchmark is unclear, although company procedures incorporate this as the minimum threshold in terms of re-establishment success. Past research indicates that most mortality occurs within a narrow period post-establishment and is often associated with substandard re-establishment practices and/or a stressed micro-environment. An improved understanding is needed about the various mitigation measures needed to minimize mortality during eucalypt re-establishment. Before making decisions related to mortality mitigation measures, comprehensive data are required as to their commercial applicability as well as outcomes from multiple trials that accurately quantify any impacts on tree survival and financial return. The overall purpose of this dissertation was the optimisation of Eucalyptus re-establishment practices for improved survival, growth and uniformity in South African pulpwood plantations. To achieve this, five inter-linked objectives were determined. The first objective was to highlight the most important factors contributing to increased mortality in eucalypt plantations during re-establishment. This was achieved through conducting a literature review. Citations were ranked in terms of credibility, with the importance ratings (derived from the literature sources) applied to the different factors affecting survival and growth during eucalypt re-establishment. Of the various factors impacting early eucalypt mortality, water stress and planting stock quality were considered highly important. The manner and quality of site preparation (soil and slash), planting practices (planting depth included), timing of planting (during dry, hot periods), various post-planting operations (incorrect fertiliser placement or herbicide drift) and insect pests and diseases also contribute to mortality, but to a lesser extent. These factors cannot be considered in isolation due to the complex interactions that exist between them and determining the primary causes of mortality can be elusive, especially as their impacts tend to be additive by nature. The second objective was to link survival to silvicultural treatments, site-related physiographic factors and climatic variables in South Africa. This was achieved by conducting an integrated analysis of 43 Eucalyptus trials. Of the seven re-establishment practices considered, watering, planting depth and fertiliser application were significant, with plant size, pitting method, residue management and insecticide application were not significant. However, when environmental variables were included within the analyses, there were significant site x treatment interactions for planting depth, plant size, residue management and fertiliser application. This highlights the importance of taking site related factors into consideration when interpreting the causes of mortality. The third objective was to determine the interaction between planting density and mortality on Eucalyptus growth, uniformity and financial yield at rotation end in South Africa. This was carried out to verify whether planting at different densities may be used as a preventative (before planting) mitigation measure. One trial was used to answer four keys sub-objectives: 1) The impact of three planting densities (1 102, 1 500, 1 959 SPH) with no mortality on yield at rotation-end; 2) The impact of mortality (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%) on rotation-end yield; 3) The quantification of tree performance when planting at a higher density and accepting a certain degree of mortality; and 4) The financial impact of different planting densities and mortality on rotation-end profit. Higher planting densities resulted in smaller individual trees, but with an increase in stand level performance. At rotation-end, lower mortality (0% and 10%) had significantly higher volumes ha-1 than the higher mortality (30% and 40%). Planting at higher densities (1 722 and 1 959 SPH) and accepting a certain degree of mortality resulted in non-significant differences for volume at rotation-end compared to the fully stocked 1 500 SPH treatment. A higher SPH resulted in a higher yield, but with an increase in estimated establishment/tending and harvesting costs. In contrast, an increase in mortality and/or lower SPH (in the absence of mortality) resulted in more variable stand growth, together with an increase in estimated machine harvesting productivity and reduced costs. Irrespective of SPH, the higher the mortality the greater the loss of income, with the best profit within each treatment related to full stocking (0% mortality). Within the higher panting densities, the profit gained following low mortality (10 and 20%) was similar to that of no mortality (0%), indicating that higher mortality may be tolerated when planting at higher densities, confirming the 90% survival threshold the industry aims to achieve post-establishment. The fourth objective was to determine if silviculture intervention (blanking at 1, 2 and 3 months or coppicing and interplanting at 6 months) will result in acceptable eucalypt stocking, if mortality is higher than 10% (remedial mitigation measure). Data from a re-establishment trial were analysed to determine which of the mitigation measures performed best in terms of stocking and growth. Coppicing and interplanting with larger plants was not a viable option as a mitigation measure for mortality as most of the coppice shoots have died. This may have been a result of frost. Although high re-establishment costs may be incurred, disaster clearing to waste followed by replanting is an option if mortality is unacceptably high (as opposed to leaving the stand as is). The results of this objective confirm that blanking as the current Best Operating Practice is still appropriate in South African forestry (i.e., try to have survival >90% and blank as soon as possible to retain >90% of stems). Blanked plants do contribute to volume, but for this to occur, blanking should be carried out within 4 weeks after planting to gain maximum benefit. In addition, it highlights the importance of implementing remedial mitigation measures to achieve >90% survival so as to gain maximum benefit. Using the outcomes from objectives 1-4, the fifth objective focussed on the development of a decision support system (DSS) for implementation of mitigation measures to improve survival within commercial eucalypt pulpwood plantations in South Africa. Improved survival starts with the implementation of good re-establishment practices and good quality planting stock. Mitigation measures for poor survival can be implemented either prior to re-establishment (before mortality occurs) or post re-establishment (after mortality has occurred). If poor survival still occurs after the implementation of good silviculture practices and pre-re-establishment mitigation practices (planting at higher densities), one should consider the various options available in terms of post re-establishment mitigation practices (remedial practices) such as blanking or replanting if mortality is high. Overall, the outcomes from this dissertation provide benchmark data and derived information as to the necessity for various mortality mitigation options within the commercial forestry sector in South Africa. In addition, the DSS will assist with decision making in terms of implementing the best silviculture practices and mitigation measures for improved survival during eucalypt re-establishment in South African pulpwood plantations. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Science, School of Natural Resource Science & Management, 2024
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2024-12
The impact of re-establishment practices on tree survival, growth and uniformity in South African eucalypt plantations
- Authors: Hechter, Ullrich
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Forests and forestry -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Forest nurseries -- South Africa -- KwaZulu Natal Forest management -- South Africa -- KwaZulu Natal
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/40338 , vital:36142
- Description: Commercial forestry plantations in South Africa play an important role in the economy of the country, contributing 1.2% towards the gross domestic product, as well as with job creation in rural communities. Currently plantation forests occupy 1.1% (1.2 million hectares) of the South African land surface, of which 75 000 hectares are re-established each year. Eucalypts are the preferred species in the commercial forestry industry as they have the ability to grow fast. In addition, desirable characteristics from different eucalypt species can be combined to develop hybrids that can be used to further improve productivity. In South Africa, eucalypt plantations are mostly found in the warm temperate and sub-tropical zones situated in the KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga Provinces. Various strategies are used to increase productivity and maximise site occupancy, including genetic tree improvement, site-species matching, optimising stand densities, management for risk (abiotic and biotic), as well as improved silviculture. Intensive silviculture is practiced by forest companies to maximise initial tree survival and reduce the time to canopy closure. This includes practices such as site preparation, slash management, tree protection, pruning and thinning, fertilisation and vegetation management treatments. Of the silvicultural aspects that are important during re-establishment, pitting, plant quality (plant size) and watering techniques/regimes have all been shown to influence short-term stand productivity. Despite research carried out on these individual components, recommendations as to best operating practices are varied and have changed over the years, with the application of these practices also varying across companies. Furthermore, there is limited published information related to the interaction between these practices, as well as any longer-term impacts of these factors on stand productivity. The objective of the present study was to gain an understanding of the impacts of pitting, plant quality (plant size), planting depth and watering on tree survival, growth and uniformity in South African Eucalyptus plantations. The study was carried out using three separate field trial series. In a first experiment, two field trials compared post-establishment performance of eucalypts planted using various pitting methods. The two trials were planted using Eucalyptus grandis and E. grandis x E. nitens on two contrasting sites, one at Greenhill in the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands and one at Vroegeveld in Mpumalanga. Four manual (notch, agricultural hoe, mattock, road pick) and three motor-manual heads (inverted A, Archimedes screw and Mondi-designed pitting head) were used to prepare and determine the effect of pit size/quality on tree survival, growth and uniformity. The notch pit implement created the smallest pit (1 L volume) compared to the other pitting implements (4 – 6 L volumes). For both trials, pitting method did not have a significant impact on the success of re-establishment or longer-term tree performance (6 yrs 7 mos at Greenhill and 3 yrs 7 mos at Vroegeveld). This indicates that for the sites and the species tested, all pitting implements could be considered viable alternatives. Other factors, such as operational costs, efficiency and ergonomics should be considered when selecting appropriate pitting methods together with tree performance. In a second experiment, three field trials were implemented to test three main factors: plant size (small and large); planting depth (standard and deep); and watering (dry and water planting). The eight treatments (2 x 2 x 2 factorial) were replicated four times and laid out in a randomised complete blocks design. The trials were established across a range of site types (Mt Home in Kwazulu-Natal, Vroegeveld in Mpumalanga and Trust in Zululand) in the summer rainfall region of South Africa using various eucalypt genera (E. dunnii, E. grandis x E. nitens and E. grandis x E. urophylla). Tree performance was assessed, with results up to four, six and seven years presented for the different sites. Results show that planting larger plants had the highest overall survival (x̄ = 81%) compared to smaller plants (x̄ = 58%), which also resulted in improved basal area and volume across all sites. Larger plants were able to tolerate a wider range of site conditions, thus providing an advantage for re-establishment. The cost-to-benefit of this however needs to be assessed, particularly in the context of current operational nursery standards. The benefits of deeper planting and applying water at planting are less clear, but appear to be beneficial under water stress conditions, such as on sandy sites when the weather is hot and dry. A third experiment tested the interaction between different methods of pit preparation (manual versus motor-manual), dry versus water planting, and re-watering at periodic intervals. The experiment consisted of one field trial established with E. dunnii in Greytown, KwaZulu-Natal. Twelve treatments (2 x 6 factorial) were replicated four times and laid out in a split-plot design, with the main factor of watering regime forming the whole plots, and pitting method the sub-plots. Differences in pit size, pit quality and tree performance were assessed. Pit dimensions and soil friability for the two pitting treatments were different, but pit volumes were similar (manually prepared pits = 4.7 L; motor-manually prepared pits = 4.4 L). Differences in pit soil moisture content were detected between dry planting (4.1%) and all other treatments (9.9%). Rainfall occurred in week 1 - 4 after planting (55.2 mm). Subsequently re-watering, relative to watering only at planting, was not beneficial. No significant growth differences occurred between the two pitting methods, nor was there any interaction between the main factors (pitting methods x watering regimes). Survival for dry planting (75%) was significantly lower than all the other treatments (92%), with a weakly significant difference in Biomass index (corrected) (BIc) at one year. Different pit qualities, determined by pitting method, will not significantly affect early eucalypt performance. However, the addition of water or hydrogel (as opposed to dry planting) will improve early eucalypt survival and growth. Eucalypt survival, growth and uniformity in South Africa continue to be impacted by an increase in mechanisation, changing climate conditions and the use of unskilled labour. It is therefore necessary to implement silvicultural practices which improve survival, growth and uniformity. Planting seedlings into good quality pits (regardless of pitting method) with water has shown to improve survival. It is also beneficial in terms of survival to plant larger (prime) plants at a deeper depth especially on sites with drought conditions. Despite all the establishment trials which have been implemented under controlled conditions, high mortality is still experienced and could be due to the lack of knowledge on the effects of plant quality and handling on post planting performance (particularly survival). In future, plant quality and handling in combination with various planting densities and the application of plant stress relievers should be considered to improve survival..
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Hechter, Ullrich
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Forests and forestry -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Forest nurseries -- South Africa -- KwaZulu Natal Forest management -- South Africa -- KwaZulu Natal
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/40338 , vital:36142
- Description: Commercial forestry plantations in South Africa play an important role in the economy of the country, contributing 1.2% towards the gross domestic product, as well as with job creation in rural communities. Currently plantation forests occupy 1.1% (1.2 million hectares) of the South African land surface, of which 75 000 hectares are re-established each year. Eucalypts are the preferred species in the commercial forestry industry as they have the ability to grow fast. In addition, desirable characteristics from different eucalypt species can be combined to develop hybrids that can be used to further improve productivity. In South Africa, eucalypt plantations are mostly found in the warm temperate and sub-tropical zones situated in the KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga Provinces. Various strategies are used to increase productivity and maximise site occupancy, including genetic tree improvement, site-species matching, optimising stand densities, management for risk (abiotic and biotic), as well as improved silviculture. Intensive silviculture is practiced by forest companies to maximise initial tree survival and reduce the time to canopy closure. This includes practices such as site preparation, slash management, tree protection, pruning and thinning, fertilisation and vegetation management treatments. Of the silvicultural aspects that are important during re-establishment, pitting, plant quality (plant size) and watering techniques/regimes have all been shown to influence short-term stand productivity. Despite research carried out on these individual components, recommendations as to best operating practices are varied and have changed over the years, with the application of these practices also varying across companies. Furthermore, there is limited published information related to the interaction between these practices, as well as any longer-term impacts of these factors on stand productivity. The objective of the present study was to gain an understanding of the impacts of pitting, plant quality (plant size), planting depth and watering on tree survival, growth and uniformity in South African Eucalyptus plantations. The study was carried out using three separate field trial series. In a first experiment, two field trials compared post-establishment performance of eucalypts planted using various pitting methods. The two trials were planted using Eucalyptus grandis and E. grandis x E. nitens on two contrasting sites, one at Greenhill in the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands and one at Vroegeveld in Mpumalanga. Four manual (notch, agricultural hoe, mattock, road pick) and three motor-manual heads (inverted A, Archimedes screw and Mondi-designed pitting head) were used to prepare and determine the effect of pit size/quality on tree survival, growth and uniformity. The notch pit implement created the smallest pit (1 L volume) compared to the other pitting implements (4 – 6 L volumes). For both trials, pitting method did not have a significant impact on the success of re-establishment or longer-term tree performance (6 yrs 7 mos at Greenhill and 3 yrs 7 mos at Vroegeveld). This indicates that for the sites and the species tested, all pitting implements could be considered viable alternatives. Other factors, such as operational costs, efficiency and ergonomics should be considered when selecting appropriate pitting methods together with tree performance. In a second experiment, three field trials were implemented to test three main factors: plant size (small and large); planting depth (standard and deep); and watering (dry and water planting). The eight treatments (2 x 2 x 2 factorial) were replicated four times and laid out in a randomised complete blocks design. The trials were established across a range of site types (Mt Home in Kwazulu-Natal, Vroegeveld in Mpumalanga and Trust in Zululand) in the summer rainfall region of South Africa using various eucalypt genera (E. dunnii, E. grandis x E. nitens and E. grandis x E. urophylla). Tree performance was assessed, with results up to four, six and seven years presented for the different sites. Results show that planting larger plants had the highest overall survival (x̄ = 81%) compared to smaller plants (x̄ = 58%), which also resulted in improved basal area and volume across all sites. Larger plants were able to tolerate a wider range of site conditions, thus providing an advantage for re-establishment. The cost-to-benefit of this however needs to be assessed, particularly in the context of current operational nursery standards. The benefits of deeper planting and applying water at planting are less clear, but appear to be beneficial under water stress conditions, such as on sandy sites when the weather is hot and dry. A third experiment tested the interaction between different methods of pit preparation (manual versus motor-manual), dry versus water planting, and re-watering at periodic intervals. The experiment consisted of one field trial established with E. dunnii in Greytown, KwaZulu-Natal. Twelve treatments (2 x 6 factorial) were replicated four times and laid out in a split-plot design, with the main factor of watering regime forming the whole plots, and pitting method the sub-plots. Differences in pit size, pit quality and tree performance were assessed. Pit dimensions and soil friability for the two pitting treatments were different, but pit volumes were similar (manually prepared pits = 4.7 L; motor-manually prepared pits = 4.4 L). Differences in pit soil moisture content were detected between dry planting (4.1%) and all other treatments (9.9%). Rainfall occurred in week 1 - 4 after planting (55.2 mm). Subsequently re-watering, relative to watering only at planting, was not beneficial. No significant growth differences occurred between the two pitting methods, nor was there any interaction between the main factors (pitting methods x watering regimes). Survival for dry planting (75%) was significantly lower than all the other treatments (92%), with a weakly significant difference in Biomass index (corrected) (BIc) at one year. Different pit qualities, determined by pitting method, will not significantly affect early eucalypt performance. However, the addition of water or hydrogel (as opposed to dry planting) will improve early eucalypt survival and growth. Eucalypt survival, growth and uniformity in South Africa continue to be impacted by an increase in mechanisation, changing climate conditions and the use of unskilled labour. It is therefore necessary to implement silvicultural practices which improve survival, growth and uniformity. Planting seedlings into good quality pits (regardless of pitting method) with water has shown to improve survival. It is also beneficial in terms of survival to plant larger (prime) plants at a deeper depth especially on sites with drought conditions. Despite all the establishment trials which have been implemented under controlled conditions, high mortality is still experienced and could be due to the lack of knowledge on the effects of plant quality and handling on post planting performance (particularly survival). In future, plant quality and handling in combination with various planting densities and the application of plant stress relievers should be considered to improve survival..
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »